For most of its history Test cricket had no competition structure. Teams arranged series with each other, those series meant a great deal individually, and none of them added up to anything. There was a ranking table, calculated by formula, and there was no tournament.
The World Test Championship, introduced in 2019, is the attempt to give the format a destination.
The basic shape
A cycle runs for roughly two years. Each participating side plays a set number of series within it, some at home and some away, and the two sides at the top of the table at the end play a one-off final.
The thing to understand is that teams do not all play the same opponents, and they do not play the same number of matches. That asymmetry is the source of the one design decision people find confusing, and it is worth understanding because everything else follows from it.
The points
Points are awarded per match, not per series:
- Win, 12 points
- Tie, 6 points
- Draw, 4 points
- Loss, 0 points
Sides can also be docked points for slow over rates, which has decided placings more than once and is a genuine competitive factor rather than an administrative footnote.
Why the table is ranked by percentage
Because a two-match series and a five-match series are not worth the same in raw points. Winning all five of a five-Test series is 60 points; winning both of a two-Test series is 24. Under a straight points total, a side whose calendar happened to contain more cricket would climb the table for reasons that had nothing to do with how well it played.
So the standings are ordered by percentage of points available, which is points won divided by points that could have been won, expressed as a percentage. Win everything and you are on 100 regardless of how many matches you played. Win half the available points and you are on 50, whether that came from two Tests or from twelve.
The first cycle did not work this way, and the problem showed immediately when the schedule was disrupted and teams ended up having played wildly different amounts of cricket. The percentage system was the fix, and it has been used since.
The final
First and second at the end of the cycle meet in a single Test at a neutral venue. If it is drawn or tied, the trophy is shared.
A single match to decide a two-year competition is the most argued-about part of the design. The case against is obvious: Test cricket is a format built around series, and one match at one venue in one set of conditions is a thin sample. The case for is that a final is a moment, and a format competing for attention with the franchise leagues needed one.
What it changed
Mostly, it gave context to matches that previously had none. A dead rubber in a bilateral series is no longer dead if the points affect a championship placing, and away wins, historically the hardest thing to achieve in cricket and historically unrewarded by any structure, now carry weight in a table somebody is watching.
What it did not solve is the imbalance in how much Test cricket different nations get to play. Some sides play three or four times as many Tests in a cycle as others, and the percentage system corrects for that in the arithmetic without changing the underlying fact.
Results from every edition are collected on our World Test Championship page, and the wider Test match archive covers the format from the 1870s onward.
Comments 0